Legal Opinion
Lanchester v. Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 26, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1744 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlisii, Jr.,
The Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission (Commission), after finding that Earl T. Lanchester (Appellant) had violated Commission Rule 15.091 by *88having in his possession while on racing grounds hypodermic needles, drugs and other paraphernalia which could affect the performance of a race horse, suspended his trainer’s license for twelve months.
The facts found by the Commission are not seriously disputed by Appellant, and therefore are binding upon this Court as supported by substantial evidence. Johnson v. State Horse Racing Commission, 5 Pa. Commonwealth…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Woods & Rohde, Inc. v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Peterson v. Commonwealth, State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Smith v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Luzzi v. Commonwealth, State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.