Legal Opinion
Breytman v. Olinville Realty, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 3, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*652The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to compel discovery only to the extent of directing the defendant to provide information concerning subsequent rentals of his former apartment. CPLR 3101 (a) provides that “[t]here shall be full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action” (see Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 NY2d 403, 406 [1968]). However, the principle of “full disclosure” does not give a party the right to unlimited disclosure (see Buxbaum v Castro, 82 AD3d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Sassower v. SignorelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Groves v. Land's End Housing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Dimery v. Ulster Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Simpson v. PtaszynskaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of Marion C.W. (Lisa K.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Churaman v. C&B Electric, Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016