Dimery v. Ulster Savings Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3) to vacate a judgment entered October 26, 2000. A party seeking relief from a judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3) must make the motion within a reasonable time (see Bank of N.Y. v Stradford, 55 AD3d 765 [2008]; Rizzo v St. Lawrence Univ., 24 AD3d 983, 984 [2005]; Aames Capital Corp. v Davidsohn, 24 AD3d 474 [2005]). Here, the plaintiffs delay of more than eight years after the entry of the subject judgment was unreasonable (Sieger v Sieger, 51 AD3d 1004, 1006 [2008]; Aames Capital…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sassower v. SignorelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bank of New York v. StradfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Sieger v. SiegerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Aames Capital Corp. v. DavidsohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Vogelgesang v. VogelgesangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- IMC Mortgage Co. v. VetereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Scholar v. TiminiskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Seldon v. Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. ColettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Czernicki v. LawniczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.