Legal Opinion
William R. Ferganchick and Robert C. Ferganchick v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1967No. 20328PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
The Ferganchick brothers, William and Robert, stand convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (d) of an armed robbery of the Pioneer National Bank, Los Angeles, California. They appeal, arguing that their arrest was illegal, thus making it error to admit in evidence the guns that they were carrying when arrested, and that the confession of Robert, given in William’s presence, was illegally obtained and should not have been received. We affirm.
Appellants were arrested on February 19, 1964 by officer Reese of the South Pasadena Police at the Santa Anita Race Track. When the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. ChimelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Marshall Roy Lurie v. E. J. Oberhauser, Warden, Peter Gary D'AllessAnDro v. C. J. Fitzharris, Superintendent, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Jesse Eugene Dearinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Leroy Herbert Ray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Dominic Fachini, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.