Housing Authority of City of Decatur v. Schroeder
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
The condemnor complains of an instruction to the jury: “Mrs. Schroeder contends that the property in question had been fully, or substantially fully, rented for some time prior to the time it became general knowledge in the neighborhood that it would be taken some time in the immediate future for urban renewal purposes. For this reason the rental units became vacant and she was unable to rent them because of the possible imminent taking of the property for urban renewal purposes. If you find this to be true, you may take into consideration the rent such property was producing or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- State Highway Department v. AndrusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Sammons v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Southern v. Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hardwick v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Housing Authority v. SchroederSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Department of Transportation v. DriggersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of St. Louis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- R. E. Adams Properties, Inc. v. City of GainesvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.