Legal Opinion

Pudney v. Burkhart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

The complaint of Burkhart against Pudney avers the following facts :

That Pudney was and is the sheriff of the county ; that-Martin A. Vaughn, on the 7th day of February, 1876, by the consideration of the Johnson Circuit Court, recovered judgment against Burkhart for two hundred and two-dollars and forty-seven cents, and for the foreclosure-of a mortgage on a certain town lot described ^ that, on the 13th day of March, 1876, a certified copy of the decree was placed in the hands of said sheriff, who-levied on and sold said lot, on the 8th day of April, 1876, after having properly advertised…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State ex rel. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. State ex rel. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Kisler v. CameronIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Dawson v. VaughanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Hagar v. MountsIndiana Supreme Court · 1832

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Workman v. WorkmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Lange v. DammierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Champ v. KendrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State ex rel. Stallings v. ReadIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Barkley v. MahonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API