Legal Opinion

Estrada v. Ramirez

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1999No. B125812PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

This is an appeal from a superior court order imposing discovery sanctions against appellant Felipe Estrada (appellant) and his attorney, Joel R. Bander (Bander). After the sanctions had been ordered, the matter was transferred to the municipal court, where it was ultimately resolved. Despite the fact that final resolution of this matter occurred in the municipal court, appellant lodged this appeal in the Court of Appeal. We conclude that jurisdiction over the appeal properly resides with the appellate division of the superior court and we dismiss.

Statement of the Case

This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. County of Lake v. AntoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gee v. American Realty & Construction Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Jade Fashion & Co. v. Harkham Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Drum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API