Legal Opinion

Coudert v. Huerstel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Gustave Huerstel, individually and as trustee, etc., of Sara Huerstel, deceased, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 11th day of February, 1901, overruling exceptions to the report of a referee, and denying a motion to set aside and vacate such report.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The question presented is between a purchaser at a sale in foreclosure and the owners of the equity of redemption, as to who is to pay $500.67, the taxes imposed for the year 1900 upon the property sold under the judgihent. The premises were sold on the 28th of August, 1900, pursuant to the judgment in this action, and were purchased by the respondent. The referee in his report of sale stated that he had paid from the purchase money certain taxes aggregating $553.27, leaving a surplus paid to the city chamberlain in pursuance of the decree of $3,273.10. The appellants, who were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burr v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Ainslie v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Fosgate v. Herkimer Manufacturing & Hydraulic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1855

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wesselman v. Engel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Wagner v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Lewis v. PetersenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Manhattan Life Insurance v. Wall Investing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. ToplitzNew York Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API