Legal Opinion

Bulen v. Granger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Bulen, as assignee of Millie M. Granger sued Granger for certain debts for money advanced by Millie M. Granger to defendant, who was once her husband, and from whom she obtained a divorce. There was proof of her advances, but defendant sought to defend partly on the ground that he had conveyed considerable property to her without any valuable consideration, which he insisted should be regarded by way of defense or reduction. Judgment passed for plaintiff, and errors are assigned upon various rulings on trial.

As our statutes have abolished the old doctrine of resulting trusts, a person who…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Judd v. JuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Bulen v. GrangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Kundinger v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API