Legal Opinion

Dove v. Dove

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 15, 2009No. S09A0197, S09X0198PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Chief Justice.

We granted appellant Paul Dove’s application for interlocutory appeal to consider whether the trial court erred by ruling that the parties’ prenuptial agreement was unenforceable because it was required to be attested by two witnesses under OCGA § 19-3-63 but was not. Lauri Dove has filed a cross-appeal, contending that the trial court erred in ruling that the prenuptial agreement satisfied the criteria of Scherer v. Scherer1 For the reasons that follow, we conclude the trial court erred in ruling that OCGA § 19-3-63 applies to the prenuptial agreement but did not err in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Simeone v. SimeoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  3. Scherer v. SchererSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Nally v. NallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  5. Haugen v. Henry CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lizzie Davis v. Oasis Legal Finance Operating Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Junior v. GrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  3. Lawrence v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Ware v. WareWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API