Kram v. Kram
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
2Per curiam
We granted certification, 51 N. J. 273 (1968), to review the judgment of the Appellate Division entered on its opinion reported in 98 N. J. Super. 274 (App. Div. 1967). We affirm substantially on that opinion, but add a few words in the light of the dissenting ’ opinion in our Court.
That Florida had jurisdiction of the marital res is not disputed; when the husband sued for and obtained the divorce, he was (and in fact still is) a Iona fide domiciliary of that State. Hence, under controlling decisions of the United States Supreme Court, the Florida…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Colby v. ColbyNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Kessler v. Fauquier National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
4Cited by13 opinions
- Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Goodpasture v. GoodpastureNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Sussex Mutual Insurance v. Hala Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Chaudry v. ChaudryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Pierrakos v. PierrakosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.