Legal Opinion
Continental Cameras Co., Inc. v. Foa & Son Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 29, 1987No. 86 Civ 6985 (LBS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, District Judge.
Defendant FOA & Son Corporation (“FOA”) moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. The motion, which arises from a dispute between an insured party and its insurance broker, requires an analysis of the somewhat blurred contours of admiralty jurisdiction. For the reasons explained, the motion to dismiss is granted.
Background
The present action was filed on behalf of Continental Cameras Co., Inc. (“Continen tal”) and one of its secured creditors,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seguros Banvenez, S.A. v. S/S Oliver DrescherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Cti-Container Leasing Corporation v. Oceanic Operations CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Peralta Shipping Corporation v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- P. D. Marchessini & Co., (NEW YORK) Inc. v. Pacific Marine Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Paul Marsh, Inc. v. Edward A. Goodman Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Exter Shipping Ltd. v. KilakosDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Fernandez v. HaynieDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Continental Cameras Co. v. Foa & Son Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.