Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 24, 2016No. 15-7039PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

Carlos Alexander brought this disability discrimination action under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., against his former employer, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“Authority”). The district court granted summary judgment to the Authority on the ground that Alexander failed to come forward with sufficient evidence that he had a “disability” as defined in the Act. In so holding, however, the district court failed to properly consider the record evidence as applied to all three of the Act’s alternative definitions of “disability.” We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Linda Solomon v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  5. Pardo-Kronemann v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Paula Babb v. Maryville Anesthesiologists, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Mancini v. City of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  3. Congress v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Pauling v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. Owens-Hart v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API