Legal Opinion

Armstrong Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1943No. Appeal, 50PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

The question upon this appeal is whether a bequest of an entire estate is a residuary clause within the meaning of Section 15 (c) of the Wills Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 403, 20 PS, Section 253.

This decedent, Elizabeth F. Armstrong, was one of four daughters of John A. Armstrong. By his will, he left the substantial part of his estate to his daughters, to the exclusion of his son, Frank S. Armstrong, Sr. The son later died intestate leaving a son, Frank S. Armstrong, Jr., as his sole heir. Of the four daughters, three died during the lifetime of this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gray's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Bricker's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Mitchell's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Willard's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. Estate of CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harris EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Bankers Trust Company v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  3. In Re Estate of BurgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Slater EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Thaw EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API