Legal Opinion
Pennington v. Polygram Group Distribution
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 25, 2001No. 99-3919PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Following Louise Pennington’s termination from PolyGram Group Distribution, she filed this lawsuit alleging discrimination based on her age and sex in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The district court granted summary judgment for PolyGram finding that Pennington could not prove that PolyGram’s reasons for terminating her were pretextual, and she now appeals. Because Pennington did not have any evidence that undermined PolyGram’s explanations for its action, we affirm.
In the 1990s PolyGram, a record and film…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Elizabeth C.O. Bellaver v. Quanex Corp./nichols-HomeshieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- William Radue v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Vicki G. Paluck v. Gooding Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Huston Stockett v. Muncie Indiana Transit SystemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pacheco-Zepeda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pacheco-Zepeda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001