Legal Opinion

Pence v. Dennie

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1919No. Civ. No. 2895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

The plaintiff, a contractor and builder, brought this action to recover from the defendant an alleged balance of $1,066.84 on a building contract totaling $46,750, together with $1,282.16 for extras alleged to have been furnished at the request of defendant, and four hundred dollars claimed as a bonus under the contract, making a total for which judgment was demanded of $2,759.

The defendant, by answer and counterclaim, admitted the original contract price of $46,750, but alleges payment of all but $90.35, denies liability for four hundred dollars bonus, or any part thereof, and claims damages…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glazer v. SchwartzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Montgomery v. KaravasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Schumann v. California Cotton Credit Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Standard Cabinet Works v. NathanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API