Legal Opinion

State v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 5, 2000No. CF01075; CA A98831Published

1Opinion of the Court

995 P.2d 561 (2000)

164 Or. App. 680

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Taul CUNNINGHAM, Appellant.

(CF01075; CA A98831)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 29, 1999.

Decided January 5, 2000.

Bob Pangburn argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge,[*] and ARMSTRONG, Judge.

EDMONDS, P.J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for sexual abuse in the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Michigan v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API