Legal Opinion

Papendick v. Robert Bosch GmbH

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 5, 1979PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

In this breach of contract action to recover a finder’s fee for the acquisition of certain shares of stock, the Superior Court dismissed the plaintiff’s action on the ground that, under Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 97 S.Ct. 2569, 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977), the defendant, Robert Bosch GmbH (hereinafter “RB”), lacked the “minimum contacts” necessary for the courts of this State to assert jurisdiction over it or its property in this State. Papendick v. Bosch, Del.Super., 389 A.2d 1315 (1979). We disagree and reverse.

I

The plaintiff, Helmut A. Papendick, has been a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Aeroglobal Capital Management, LLC v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Crescent/Mach I Partners, L.P. v. TurnerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  3. Istituto Bancario Italiano SpA v. Hunter Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Sternberg v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  5. Outokumpu Engineering Enterprises, Inc. v. Kvaerner EnviroPower, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API