State v. Fonseca
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review Fonseca v. State, 570 So.2d 424, 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), which certified the same question of great public importance answered in Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992):
Should Pope v. State [, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990),] be applied retroactively to sentences imposed prior to April 26, 1990?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. As in Smith, the certified question is answered in the affirmative. While we find the district court’s conclusions consistent with our views in Smith, we nevertheless quash the opinion under review and remand for reconsideration in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Fonseca v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fonseca v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993