Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 2, 1992No. 76235PublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

598 So.2d 1063 (1992)

Rhoda SMITH, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 76235.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 2, 1992.

Rehearing Denied June 16, 1992.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti A. Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Monique T. Befeler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondent.

BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review State v. Smith, 592 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), in which the district court certified the following as a question of great public importance:

Should Pope v. State [, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990),] be…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Grimes; Concurrence · Harding.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. State v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API