Legal Opinion

People v. Franklin

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1968No. Crim. 13143PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

Defendant Andrew Franklin was charged by information with violation of section 11530 of the Health and Safety Code (possession of marijuana). Charged in the same information was one Willie James Stephens. Franklin entered a plea of not guilty, waived right to trial by jury, and submitted upon the preliminary hearing transcript, subject to the production of further evidence by either side. The prosecution called one of the arresting officers to give further testimony, and the codefendant Stephens testified. Franklin did not testify. Franklin and codefendant Stephens were each found guilty of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HavenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. CowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Wirin v. HorrallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. AnushevitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. United States v. Alexander Manuel MallidesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. People v. LoewenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. WeitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. VermouthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API