Legal Opinion

Bowens v. City of Pontiac

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1988No. Docket 96213PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. F. Walsh, P.J.

Defendant City of Pontiac appeals from the order of the Oakland Circuit Court directing defendant to pay $50,000 to plaintiff Robert Bowens. The judgment represents the amount of attorney fees incurred by plaintiff in his successful defense against a state charge of conspiracy to violate gambling laws and federal charges of conspiracy to conduct an illegal gambling operation and to obstruct state law enforcement. At all relevant times plaintiff was an elected city commissioner representing district one in the City of Pontiac. On appeal, defendant claims that the court erred in entering…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Warren v. DannisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Messmore v. KrachtMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Sonnenberg v. Farmington TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Exeter Township Clerk v. Exeter Township BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Warda v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF FLUSHINGMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bowens v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Warda v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF FLUSHINGMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Wright v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API