Legal Opinion
Robert John Brady v. The State Bar of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1976No. 74-2361PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before DUNIWAY, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Brady appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion for a preliminary injunction and his request that a three-judge district court be convened, and dismissing his action for failure to state a claim for relief cognizable by the court. We affirm.
The district court properly refused to convene a three-judge court under 28 U.S.C. § 2281. The Supreme Court has held that malapportionment of representation on a state bar governing body is not a violation of fourteenth amendment rights. Sullivan v. Alabama State…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Warren L. Smith v. The State of California, Edmund G. Brown, GovernorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Sullivan v. Alabama State BarDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1969
- Sullivan v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoffman v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Plowman v. MassadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Plowman v. MassadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995