Legal Opinion

Forest Products v. Parvin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, Justice.

Forest Products, a division of the Ludlow Corporation, has appealed from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Hamblen County awarding James Parvin benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The appellant insists the trial judge erred in finding that the cerebral-vascular accident suffered by the appellee arose out of his employment and contests the sufficiency of proof as to causal connection between ap-pellee’s injury and his employment.

“The Legislature in enacting the compensation act expressly entrusted the trial court with the power to find the facts and when…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coleman v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Patterson Transfer Co. v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  3. General Shale Products Corp. v. CaseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Nashville Pure Milk Company v. RychenTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  5. RE Butts Company v. PowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. King v. Jones Truck LinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API