Forest Products v. Parvin
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, Justice.
Forest Products, a division of the Ludlow Corporation, has appealed from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Hamblen County awarding James Parvin benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The appellant insists the trial judge erred in finding that the cerebral-vascular accident suffered by the appellee arose out of his employment and contests the sufficiency of proof as to causal connection between ap-pellee’s injury and his employment.
“The Legislature in enacting the compensation act expressly entrusted the trial court with the power to find the facts and when…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coleman v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Patterson Transfer Co. v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
- General Shale Products Corp. v. CaseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- Nashville Pure Milk Company v. RychenTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
- RE Butts Company v. PowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- King v. Jones Truck LinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1991