Legal Opinion

Bell v. Pate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from "Wayne. Foreclosure. Defendant Mary appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

The sole purpose of complainant in filing- • this bill was to obtain foreclosure of a mortgage executed to him on tbe 12th of October, 1878, by the defendants Edgar and Kate Pate, and at the same time to have a claim of title-asserted hy defendant Mary, examined and cancelled.

The court below made the usual decree of foreclosure, authorizing the premises to be sold, and in case of sale barring all rights and claims of the respective defendants, and providing that the purchaser should be let into possession.. The defendant Mary A. Pate appealed. She is in possession and holds, as the bill…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dial v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Rathbone v. . HooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Peters v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Banning v. BradfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  5. Summers v. BromleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCamman v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Dickerson v. UhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API