Legal Opinion
Dickerson v. Uhl
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from Kent. (-Montgomery, J.) Foreclosure case. Defendants Dili and Grove appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
On May 13, 1875, John Huggard gave to Francis Huggard his note due in two years from date' for $3,000, with interest, and at the same time executed to Francis a mortgage on the S. E. of section 1, and N. % of N. E. £ of section 12, in toAvnship 10 N., of range 10 W., in the county.of Kent, to secure the payment of said note.
October 19, 1875, John Huggard conveyed to Francis Huggard, in payment of about $500 of the said mortgage money, the N. E. J of the N. E. ¿ of said section 12, part of the mortgaged premises. The deed was duly *399acknowledged and delivered, and Francis placed it of record in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dial v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Rathbone v. . HooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Banning v. BradfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Summers v. BromleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Bell v. PateMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by1 opinion
- Campbell v. BaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1898