Legal Opinion

Parente v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1934No. Civ. 5219PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This cause is before us upon the application of the above-named petitioner praying that a writ of mandate be directed to the respondent directing and commanding the respondent to issue an “on sale” beer and wine license for premises situate at No. 154 Columbus Avenue, in the city of San Francisco.

It appears from the record that on or about the third day of April, 1934, the petitioner above named caused to be filed with the State Board of Equalization an application for an “on sale” beer and wine license, sales to be made at a restaurant conducted by the petitioner at 154 Columbus Avenue, San…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sandelin v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ainsworth v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Los Angeles Brewing Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Jey Lyang Yu v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API