Legal Opinion
Caterpillar, Inc. v. Doherty
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 16, 1998No. 2-97-1217PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rapp
Defendant-claimant, Bruce Hartzell (Hartzell), filed a claim for unemployment benefits with The Department of Employment Security (Department). Plaintiff-employer, Caterpillar, Inc. (Caterpillar), protested the claim. A claims adjudicator determined Hartzell was eligible for unemployment benefits. Caterpillar appealed the claims adjudicator’s determination. A Department referee conducted a hearing and determined Hartzell was eligible for unemployment benefits. Caterpillar appealed the referee’s decision to the Board of Review of the Department of Employment Security (Board of Review). The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Texaco-Cities Service Pipeline Co. v. McGawIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. AldridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Illinois Power Co. v. MahinIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Harvey Firemen's Ass'n v. City of HarveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. DohertyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Acevedo v. Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Indesco Products, Inc. v. NovakAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Pesoli v. Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Matlock v. Illinois Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.