Legal Opinion

Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Aldridge

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1997No. 82375PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Freeman

Section 604 of the Illinois Unemployment Insurance Act disqualifies an employee from receiving unemployment benefits where the employee is voluntarily unemployed because of a labor strike at the place where he or she was "last employed.” 820 ILCS 405/604 (West 1994). In Dienes v. Holland, 78 Ill. 2d 8 (1979), this court interpreted the phrase "last employed” to mean simply last in time.

This appeal requires us to ascertain whether the legislature intended to add conditions to section 604 of the Act by amending other sections of the Act subsequent to Dienes. We cannot discern such an intent…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Solich v. George & Anna Portes Cancer Prevention Center of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Belfield v. CoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Burke v. 12 Rothschild's Liquor Mart, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Sherman v. CrynsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ragan v. Columbia Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Price v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Fisher v. Lexington Health Care, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 2005

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API