Legal Opinion

(PC) Adkins v. Schultz

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 26, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01654Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS, No. 2:23-cv-1654 AC P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 J. SCHULTZ, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

17 without a lawyer. He has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this 18 action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot 19 afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to 20…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API