Legal Opinion
Porter v. Daggett County
District Court, D. Utah
Decided December 30, 2022No. 2:18-cv-00389Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION DUSTIN PORTER, et al., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS (DOC. NO. 174) v. AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DAGGETT COUNTY, et al., Consolidated Case Nos. 2:18-cv-00389, 2:18-cv-00422, & 2:19-cv-00188 Defendants. District Judge David Barlow Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Plaintiffs Dustin Porter, Steven Drollette, Joshua Asay, and Joshua Olson have filed a motion for sanctions1 under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.2 Plaintiffs contend counsel for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Collins v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Edwards v. HareDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1988