Legal Opinion · Dissent

Samper v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1952No. 28,818PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

*53DISSENTING OPINION

Emmert, J.

We should be very careful that we do not stretch the tax laws by implication to tax gross income at a higher rate than the law prescribes, since it is perfectly ethical and proper for any taxpayer to avoid higher tax rates if he can conduct his business so a lower rate applies. The evasion of taxes justly due under a statute is a wrong done the government, but it should be noted, and always remembered, that it is just as immoral and evil for the sovereign, acting through its tax agents, to extract money not due in the guise of taxes from one of its citizens, as it…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Freeman v. HewitSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. J. D. Adams Manufacturing Co. v. StorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bullen v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Superior Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Department of Treasury v. MuesselIndiana Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samper v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API