Legal Opinion

Etsell v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 30, 2022No. 5:21-cv-00724Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RYAN ETSELL et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-21-724-G ) STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Now before the Court is Defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty’s (“State Farm”) Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Negligence Claim (Doc. No. 6). Plaintiffs Ryan Etsell and Sarah Etsell responded in opposition (Doc. No. 7), and Defendant replied (Doc. No. 8). SUMMARY OF THE PLEADINGS Plaintiffs allege that their home sustained weather-related damage, primarily to the roof of the house, in May 2020. See Pet.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Burnett v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. Anderson v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Lewis v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API