Legal Opinion
Bradley Ammerman v. Capital One Bank
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 5, 2026No. 5:25-cv-01047Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA BRADLEY AMMERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-01047-JD ) CAPITAL ONE BANK, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Capital One Bank’s (“Capital One”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (“Motion”) [Doc. No. 10]. Plaintiff Bradley Ammerman responded in opposition [Doc. No. 13], and Capital One replied in support of the Motion [Doc. No. 14].1 Also before the Court is Plaintiff Bradley Ammerman’s Motion for Leave to File a Proposed Second Amended Complaint (“Motion for Leave to Amend”)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Louise Whitney v. State of New Mexico Charles Patrick, Employee of the State of New Mexico John/jane Doe, Unknown Employees of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.