Webster v. Roe
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rhodes, J.:
This is a motion for summary judgment on the pleadings. The complaint alleges a cause of action upon a promissory note. The answer sets up the defense of usury. After interposing his answer, defendant obtained an order requiring the plaintiff to serve a reply to the allegations setting up the defense of usury. Thereupon the plaintiff did serve a reply thereto. Defendant thereupon moved to strike out the reply upon the ground that it is “ inconsistent *111with the complaint in that the complaint sets forth an alleged cause of action at law upon a promissory note, whereas the reply sets…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Orvis v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Spain v. Hamilton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Clemens v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Brown v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Browne v. . VredenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commercial Investment Trust, Inc. v. EskewNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- Merinos Viesca y Compania, Inc. v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931
- Webster v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1926