Legal Opinion

Webster v. Roe

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

Plaintiff heretofore brought an action on a note. Defendant interposed an answer setting up the defense of usury, and procured an order of this court directing the plaintiff to serve a reply to such defense. Pursuant thereto plaintiff served a reply. Without enumerating all of the various steps taken by the respective parties, it is sufficient to say that thereafter the defendant moved at Special Term for judgment on the pleadings, which motion was denied (124 Misc. 110), whereupon defendant appealed to the Appellate Division from the order denying defendant’s motion and the Appellate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allerton v. . BeldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Minturn v. . Farmers' Loan and Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Schoonmaker v. BonnieNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Webster v. RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. Webster v. RoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeSimon v. Ogden AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API