(HC) Kyle S. Cooper v. D. Baughman
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KYLE S. COOPER, No. 2:16-cv-3039 DB 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 D. BAUGHMAN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus 18 under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Both parties have consented to proceed before the undersigned for all 19 purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF Nos 7, 13). Presently before the court is the 20 petition (ECF No. 1) and respondent’s answer for merits review (ECF No. 17). For the reasons 21 set forth below the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.