Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Chicago, St. P. & K. C. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At Law. On demurrer to complaint. Action by Douglas Lewis against Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Company.

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

A demurrer was argued in this case, and I shall confine myself to a single issue raised therein. I think it settled law that a corporation can be held responsible for a tort, even to the extent of holding it liable for a tort of such a character that a court would call it so wanton as to be malicious; and that a master may be responsible for an assault and battery committed by one of his servants, whether that assault and battery be committed upon a co-servant or a stranger. I also take it to be settled under the rules of pleading that what was equivalent to a common count under the old…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Saucer v. Willys-Overland, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1931
  3. Plummer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API