Blair v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.
Sheila Blair appeals from her conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI). She argues that her conviction should be reversed because the State failed to prove that she was driving a vehicle or that she was driving while intoxicated. Because an eyewitness identified appellant as the driver and sufficient circumstantial evidence proved that she was intoxicated, we affirm her conviction.
Background Facts
Appellant was arrested for DWI after police investigated a report made by a citizen, George Brooks. Brooks testified that he observed a silver compact car stopped…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Wetherington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Azbill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011