McDowell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of salé in dry area.
Acting under authority of a search warrant officers found on appellant’s premises 96 cans of Grand Prize beer, 33 bottles of Falstaff beer and two pints of whisky. Appellant testified thát the liquor in question had been bought by him for his *531own personal use, and that he had it for such purpose and not for the purpose of sale.
The State proved over appellant’s objection by one of the officers that some two months before the raid he had bought a pint of whisky from appellant at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Deshazo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Griggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Griggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- McLendon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Stuart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Brenda Cheatham v. Texarkana College and Frank Coleman, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.