Deshazo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.
Without detailing it, the evidence is regarded sufficient to support the verdict.
The search-warrant and affidavit for the search-warrant were in-, troduced in evidence. The objections made were not pertinent. We observe, however, no legal reason for receiving either of these documents in evidence. See Bryant v. State, 94 Texas Crim. Rep., 67; 250 S. W. Rep., 169; Gurski v. State, 93 Texas Crim. Rep.,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gurski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Askew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- McDowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Bird v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Crutchfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Reid v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.