Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Byles

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1973No. 4197PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

280 So.2d 624 (1973)

HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Daniel Lamar BYLES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 4197.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 29, 1973.

Watson, Murchison, Crews & Arthur by William P. Crews, Jr., Natchitoches, for plaintiff-appellant.

Whitehead & McCoy by Charles R. Whitehead, Jr., Natchitoches, for defendant-appellee.

Before HOOD, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

HOOD, Judge.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company settled with its insured, Stanley P. Barrios, under the uninsured motorist provisions of its policy. Hartford then sued the uninsured…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moncrieff v. LacobieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Monteleone v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  3. Cooper v. Jennings Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. American Indemnity Co. v. New York F. & M. Under., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Harris v. Huval Baking CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Raymond D. Louviere v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Volume Shoe Corp. v. ArmatoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Coates v. AC AND S, INC.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994
  4. Courtney v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Wheelahan v. EllerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API