Legal Opinion

Volume Shoe Corp. v. Armato

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1977No. 13111PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

341 So.2d 611 (1977)

VOLUME SHOE CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Mary L. ARMATO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13111.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

January 10, 1977.

Brocato & Mangham by C. P. Brocato, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant Mary L. Armato.

Blanchard, Walker, O'Quin & Roberts by J. Edgerton Pierson, Jr., Shreveport, for plaintiffs-appellees and intervenors-appellees, Pay-Less Shoes, et al.

Lunn, Irion, Switzer, Johnson & Salley by Jack E. Carlisle, Jr., Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellee Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. and Mary L. Armato, defendant-appellant.

Before HALL,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. BylesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JordanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Reynolds v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Aetna Ins. Co. v. NaquinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Charia v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Coates v. AC AND S, INC.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994
  4. Courtney v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Blalock v. LordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API