Legal Opinion

Black Bull Enterprises, Inc. v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 19, 1991No. A8906-03174; CA A64150PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendant in this action to recover on a promissory note on which defendant was a guarantor. We affirm.

In 1983, plaintiff agreed to sell its shares in Grand Development Company back to Grand Development Company. The sale enabled Schwartz to gain control of the company. Schwartz was president of Grand Development and is the husband of defendant’s daughter. The terms of the sale required Grand Development, through Schwartz as president, to execute a promissory note personally guaranteed by him, his wife and defendant. The note was not paid and, in 1987, Schwartz…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Savage, as Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Marshall-Wells Co. v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. SimsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lloyd Corporation v. O'CONNOROregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Fassett v. Deschutes Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Nat'l Bank of Anthony v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API