Union Bank v. Hackett, Gates, Hurty Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.
Tfiis is ah action'for money had and received. The defendant demurred on the grovmd-that the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Erom an order overruling the demurrer the defendant appeals.
Of course the demurrer admits only facts well pleaded. On the other hand, on demurrer, all the intendments both inferential and presumptive are in favor' of the challenged pleading. Thus considered, the complaint, which is exceedingly meager in its allegations, may be said to state: That the plaintiff is a domestic banking corporation; the defendant, a foreign…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Long v. West & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Gile v. Interstate Motor Car Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Gerwein v. McDonnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoffer v. CrawfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- Uhrig v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Rosenquist v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1956