Long v. West & Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Montgomery District Court. Action by Adam Long and John Long, partners as Long Brothers, against S. N. West and three others, partners as West & Co., to recover on an account for goods sold and delivered to defendants. The plaintiffs obtained an order of attachment, which was levied upon a stock of goods belonging to defendants. April 2, 1883, on a hearing had before the judge of the district court at chambers, the attachment was discharged.
Read the full summary
Error from Montgomery District Court. Action by Adam Long and John Long, partners as Long Brothers, against S. N. West and three others, partners as West & Co., to recover on an account for goods sold and delivered to defendants. The plaintiffs obtained an order of attachment, which was levied upon a stock of goods belonging to defendants. April 2, 1883, on a hearing had before the judge of the district court at chambers, the attachment was discharged. This ruling the plaintiffs bring here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
On February 5, 1883, the plaintiffs in error brought an action in the district court of Montgomery county against the defendants in error, to recover the sum of $142.73, which was alleged to be due on an account for goods, wares and merchandise alleged to have been furnished by the plaintiffs to the defendants. At the same time an order of attachment was issued, and was levied upon a stock of goods belonging to the defendants. On March 5, 1883, the defendants filed a motion to discharge the attachment as to the whole of the property…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Tourtelotte v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals · 1894
- Frazier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Jones v. CoateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Wyatt v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Bank of Commerce v. SchlotfeldtNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.