Joyner v. . Stancill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The facts, extracted from the report of the referee, presented on appeal, were as follows:
1. On 24 March, 1876, B. S. Atkinson was indebted to Rountree Co., in the sum of $621.63, which amount was evidenced by one promissory note and secured by a mortgage upon the lands mentioned in the complaint.
2. Afterward, and before 1882, the note and mortgage were assigned to defendant Stancill.
3. On 28 February, 1882, Atkinson was indebted to said Stancill in the amount of the note assigned to him, and various other amounts by note or account, and that on said day Atkinson and defendant came to a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hyman v. . Devereux and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- Faw v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Battle v. MayoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Sturtevant v. Selma Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Dawson v. Thigpen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stevens v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Stevens v. . TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Windsor Trust Co. v. ChampignySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927