Hosford v. Rowe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Young, J., presiding, granting a new trial for newly-discovered evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The respondent, Carrie M. Hosford, is the widow of the deceased, John H. Hosford. Before her marriage to him she was a widow, and bore the name of Thompson. The appellants are his daughters by a former marriage. By an order of the probate court for the distribution of the estate, the respondent, the widow, was allowed to take in accordance with the statute, as though her rights were not affected by the antenuptial» contract hereafter to be referred to. The daughters of the deceased appealed to the district court. Upon trial of the cause in the latter court a jury was called, and three *246question…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Desnoyer v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by14 opinions
- Appleby v. Estates of ApplebySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Malchow v. MalchowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Halvorsen v. Moon & Kerr Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Berg v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Still v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.