Legal Opinion

Stanford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1942No. 22329PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for keeping a bawdy house, punishment being a fine of $200.00 and twenty days in jail.

Officers testified that on January 10, 1942, they went to the Windham Hotel, which is on the second and third floors of a building on Fannin Street in the City of Houston, where they found appellant and a number of girls — whom it is not necessary here to name — and also a number of men, some of whom were soldiers, and some students. The officers stayed about two hours during which time several men came to the place. Appellant and the four girls were arrested and taken…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. McPhail v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Hogland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Burke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Byars v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Byars v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API