Hogland v. State

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing equipment, etc. for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

Two officers testified for the state and fully made out the case. Appellant introduced no testimony. The record exhibits four bills of exception. The first complains of the reception of the officers’ testimony as to what was found on appellant’s premises upon a search, — the ground of objection being that the affidavit for search warrant was made on information and belief. We further observe that the officers testified when they met appellant, before they…